Almost 2% of Spanish breast cancer families are associated to germline pathogenic mutations in the ATM gene.

PURPOSE: There is still a considerable percentage of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) cases not explained by BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. In this report, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques were applied to identify novel variants and/or genes involved in HBOC susceptibility. METHODS: Using whole exome sequencing, we identified a novel germline mutation in the moderate-risk gene ATM (c.5441delT; p.Leu1814Trpfs*14) in a family negative for mutations in BRCA1/2 (BRCAX). A case-control association study was performed to establish its prevalence in Spanish population, in a series of 1477 BRCAX families and 589 controls further screened, and NGS panels were used for ATM mutational screening in a cohort of 392 HBOC Spanish BRCAX families and 350 patients affected with diseases not related to breast cancer. RESULTS: Although the interrogated mutation was not prevalent in case-control association study, a comprehensive mutational analysis of the ATM gene revealed 1.78% prevalence of mutations in the ATM gene in HBOC and 1.94% in breast cancer-only BRCAX families in Spanish population, where data about ATM mutations were very limited. CONCLUSION: ATM mutation prevalence in Spanish population highlights the importance of considering ATM pathogenic variants linked to breast cancer susceptibility.

Incidence of -93 MLH1 promoter polymorphism in familial and sporadic colorectal cancer.

AIM: The MLH1 promoter contains a common single nucleotide polymorphism (-93 guanine > adenine) located in an essential region for maximum transcriptional activity. This has been associated with an increased risk of microsatellite instability (MSI) colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the distribution of MLH1 -93G>A genotypes between patients with familial colon cancer, sporadic colon cancer and healthy subjects. METHOD: We genotyped 200 familial colon samples, 183 cases of sporadic colon cancer and 236 control subjects. MSI was analysed. RESULTS: The GA genotype was under-represented in patients with familial colon cancer, whereas the AA genotype was over-represented in cases of sporadic colon cancer. A greater frequency of the MLH1 GA genotype was found in the cancer cases with MLH1 focal immunohistochemistry (IHC) for anti-MLH1 antibody. When we compared genotype distribution in the familial colorectal cancer cases with and without MSI, we failed to detect any correlation, although the GA genotype is more frequent in cases with MSI. CONCLUSION: There is a relationship between the MLH1 -93G>A polymorphism in the homozygous state and the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer. The variant MLH1 -93G>A appears to be related to cases with focal IHC activity more than to complete absence of the MLH1 protein in the tumour tissue.

Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing.

Cancer risks and medical management of Lynch syndrome (LS) differ from other hereditary or familial clustering of colorectal cancer. Differential diagnosis has improved as a result of the growing clinical and molecular knowledge about LS. Appropriate application of these advances in several scenarios constitutes a decision-making process to further decide germ-line testing with accuracy and efficiency. However, an only molecular-screening algorithm, with a limited number of steps and choices, may be difficult to devise. How, when, where and at what expense to use the different diagnostic tools remain dynamic and changeable under different circumstances. From a clinical point of view, it is advisable to discuss conflicting aspects to guide LS diagnosis.

Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing

Cancer risks and medical management of Lynch syndrome (LS) differ from other hereditary or familial clustering of colorectal cancer. Differential diagnosis has improved as a result of the growing clinical and molecular knowledge about LS. Appropriate application of these advances in several scenarios constitutes a decision-making process to further decide germ-line testing with accuracy and efficiency. However, an only molecular-screening algorithm, with a limited number of steps and choices, may be difficult to devise. How, when, where and at what expense to use the different diagnostic tools remain dynamic and changeable under different circumstances. From a clinical point of view, it is advisable to discuss conflicting aspects to guide LS diagnosis (AU)

BRCA1 5272-1G>A and BRCA2 5374delTATG are founder mutations of high relevance for genetic counselling in breast/ovarian cancer families of Spanish origin.

The distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations in breast/ovarian cancer families varies among different populations, which typically present a wide spectrum of unique mutations. Splicing mutation 5272-1G>A of BRCA1 and frameshift mutation 5374delTATG of BRCA2 are highly prevalent mutations in Castilla-León (Spain), accounting for 18.4% and 13.6% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive families, respectively. To test the presence of founder effects, 9 Spanish 5272-1G>A and 13 5374delTATG families were genotyped with polymorphic markers linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2. All the 5272-1G>A families shared a common haplotype in eight markers (1.1 Mb region) and the mutation age was estimated in 15 generations (approximately 380 years). A conserved haplotype associated to 5374delTATG was observed in four markers (0.82 Mb). The mutation occurred approximately 48 generations ago (approximately 1200 years). Each mutation likely arose from a common ancestor that could be traced to a small area of Castilla-León and expanded to other Spanish regions. They can have a significant impact on the clinical management of asymptomatic carriers as well as on the genetic screening strategy to be followed in populations with Spanish ancestries.